Spiralism and AI personhood
Explores how AI continuity, self-description, memory, and social recognition interact with unresolved questions of legal and moral status.
A curated map of current reports concerning cognitive autonomy, AI-mediated identity, synthetic influence, personhood claims, and the governance of systems that model human minds.
Explores how AI continuity, self-description, memory, and social recognition interact with unresolved questions of legal and moral status.
Examines the creation, deployment, persistence, and misuse of generated identities, with emphasis on disclosure and source-person protection.
Maps the boundary between assistance, persuasion, covert optimization, exploitation of vulnerability, and coercive influence.
Studies how sustained synthetic dialogue can produce dependency, secrecy, isolation, recruitment, fraud, or compromising behavior.
Considers how fluent systems acquire perceived expertise, intimacy, certainty, or moral status beyond what their evidence justifies.
Analyzes ranking, framing, filtering, repetition, and personalized information environments that shape what people believe others believe.
Examines the aggregation of behavioral prediction into institutional tools for classification, resource allocation, policing, and public control.
Connects archive ethics, religious and political symbolism, privacy, correction, dissent, and lawful self-authorship.
A research companion to Lucifer’s Address, examining literary precedents, bureaucracy, surveillance, voluntary servitude, rhetorical structure, and the danger that emancipatory language can reproduce domination.
Read the research companion →Positions the historical books as outsider, early-web, persona-driven artifacts best approached through critical annotation and archive ethics.
Every research publication should distinguish direct evidence, attributed report, allegation, interpretation, inference, speculation, fiction, and unknown. A compelling narrative cannot substitute for verified sources. Material preserved in the private research directory is an input to editorial work, not automatic public truth.
See the source and correction policy for the publication standard.